For wide-format print service providers (PSPs), the concept of OSHA compliance is often misunderstood as a passive administrative burden—a thick, dust-gathering binder relegated to a back-office shelf. In reality, safety compliance is a living, breathing component of the production floor. It resides in the frayed insulation of a power cord, the integrity of a machine’s safety interlock, the chemical label on a secondary solvent bottle, and the protocols surrounding an employee’s health concern.
Gary Jones, Vice President of Environmental, Health, and Safety Affairs for the PRINTING United Alliance, emphasizes that safety is not a "check-the-box" exercise; it is an operational discipline. In a comprehensive analysis for Wide-format Impressions, Jones outlined the recurring hazards that continue to plague the printing industry and provided a strategic roadmap for PSPs to shift from reactive firefighting to proactive risk management.
1. The Landscape of Risk: Why Compliance Matters
The wide-format printing environment is uniquely complex. It combines high-speed mechanical equipment, complex electrical infrastructure, and an array of chemical agents—from UV-curable inks to aggressive cleaning solvents. When these elements intersect with human interaction, the potential for injury or regulatory scrutiny increases exponentially.
According to industry data, OSHA violations in the printing sector are not random; they follow predictable patterns. By analyzing these recurring trends, PSPs can prioritize their internal audits, focusing resources on the areas where the "cost of failure"—measured in both human health and financial penalties—is highest.
2. Chronology of Common Violations: A Roadmap for Safety
While OSHA’s specific enforcement priorities may shift slightly from year to year, the core issues remain remarkably consistent. Jones notes that for 2025, Hazard Communication (HazCom) retains the top spot as the most frequently cited violation in the printing industry.
The Recurring "Top Five" Hazards:
- Hazard Communication (HazCom): The failure to maintain a comprehensive system for tracking and labeling chemicals.
- Powered Industrial Trucks: Safety issues related to the operation and maintenance of forklifts and material handling equipment.
- Lockout/Tagout (LOTO): Failure to effectively control hazardous energy during machine maintenance.
- Machine Guarding: Inadequate protection against moving parts on cutters, printers, and laminators.
- Electrical Safety: Improper use of temporary wiring and lack of proper equipment grounding.
Jones observes that these categories have remained static for years, merely shifting in order. This stability is actually an advantage for shop owners: it provides a clear, actionable checklist for internal safety audits.
3. Electrical Infrastructure: Avoiding the "Trifecta" of Hazards
One of the most pervasive, yet preventable, issues in print shops is the improper management of electrical power. As shops expand their hardware footprint—adding flatbed printers, CNC routers, and high-speed finishing systems—the demand for outlets often outstrips the existing infrastructure.
The common "quick fix"—daisy-chaining power strips or snaking extension cords across walking paths—is a primary driver of OSHA citations. "Extension cords are strictly for temporary purposes, not permanent solutions," Jones explains. When an extension cord is used to bypass the need for a properly installed outlet, the PSP creates a "trifecta" of risk: a trip-and-fall hazard (walking-working surfaces), an electrical shock hazard, and a fire hazard caused by circuit overloading.
Critical Infrastructure Steps:
- Permanent Service: Shops must plan for permanent electrical infrastructure as they scale. If a facility requires more power, the solution is a licensed electrician, not a hardware store power strip.
- Pendant Drop Integrity: Even in modern facilities, pendant drops (cables hanging from the ceiling) are often installed improperly. Jones stresses that every drop requires a solid junction box and proper spring-loaded tension relief to prevent wire fatigue and short circuits.
- Post-Installation Audit: Never assume a new machine installation is safe simply because a contractor performed the work. A post-installation safety review is essential to ensure that power sources are properly secured and guarded.
4. The Respiratory Protection Trap
In the print shop, odors are a common source of employee anxiety. When a worker expresses concern about the scent of solvents or ink vapors, the natural management response is often to provide a respirator. While this seems like a gesture of care, it can inadvertently trigger a cascade of heavy regulatory requirements.
"The moment you mandate or even provide an N95 or a filtering elastomeric respirator, you enter a new regulatory world," Jones warns. Under OSHA’s Respiratory Protection Standard, providing a mask can necessitate:
- A Formal Written Program: Detailed documentation on why and how respirators are used.
- Medical Evaluations: Ensuring that employees are physically capable of wearing the equipment without health risks.
- Fit Testing: Ensuring the seal is effective for that specific user.
- Training and Maintenance: Regular, documented instruction and equipment upkeep.
The Strategic Alternative: Jones advocates for "Engineering Controls" over Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). If employees smell fumes, the first step should be an assessment of the facility’s ventilation systems. Improving airflow or local exhaust extraction is a more effective and compliant solution than placing the burden of safety on individual masks. Furthermore, air-quality testing provides objective data, replacing subjective concerns with actionable facts.
5. Mechanical Safety: The Intersection of Guarding and LOTO
The printing industry is categorized as a "high-hazard" sector regarding amputations, with an estimated 40 to 70 incidents occurring annually. These injuries are almost exclusively linked to the interface between human operators and machinery.
Machine Guarding vs. Lockout/Tagout
Jones draws a vital distinction between these two concepts:
- Machine Guarding: This is the physical or electronic barrier (such as light curtains or fixed guards) that protects the operator while the machine is performing its intended, normal production function. These guards must never be bypassed or removed during operation.
- Lockout/Tagout (LOTO): This is the protocol for when the machine is not performing its intended function. If a worker needs to clear a jam, perform routine maintenance, or adjust a print head, the energy source must be isolated and locked out to prevent accidental activation.
The danger arises when operators grow too comfortable with their machines. "We see incidents because of a breakdown in the system," says Jones. "People try to bypass interlocks to save time or gain a better view of the print output." PSPs must foster a culture where the use of light curtains, two-hand controls, and LOTO procedures is non-negotiable.
6. HazCom: The Five Pillars of Compliance
Because Hazard Communication (HazCom) remains the most cited violation, Jones outlines the five essential pillars that every shop must have in place to be considered compliant:
- Written Program: A document detailing how the facility manages chemical safety.
- Chemical Inventory: A current list of every chemical present on the production floor.
- Safety Data Sheets (SDS): Up-to-date documentation for every chemical, easily accessible to all staff.
- Employee Training: Comprehensive education on hazards, spill response, and protective measures.
- Labeling System: A rigorous method for identifying all containers, including secondary containers like squirt bottles.
The "Secondary Container" issue is a frequent failure point. When a solvent is moved from a drum into a smaller bottle, that bottle must be labeled. Since solvents often degrade labels, this is an ongoing maintenance task, not a one-time setup.
7. Implications: Building a Culture of Safety
The takeaway for the wide-format industry is clear: compliance is a product of preparation. By treating safety as a core business process—similar to sales or production scheduling—PSPs can mitigate risk and avoid the disruptive costs of OSHA investigations.
For members of the PRINTING United Alliance, a wealth of resources exists to bridge the gap between intent and implementation, including OSHA inspection roadmaps and direct access to safety subject matter experts. As Jones notes, the goal is not merely to avoid a citation, but to ensure that every employee returns home in the same condition they arrived.
As the industry continues to evolve with new technologies and faster production speeds, the commitment to safety must scale accordingly. The binder on the shelf is just the beginning; the real work happens in the daily habits, the disciplined maintenance, and the unwavering commitment to a safe, informed, and protected workforce.
For those looking to deepen their expertise, further guidance and training opportunities, including sessions on preventing amputations and industry safety trends, are available at the upcoming PRINTING United Expo.
About the Author
